2. Although the defendant's mistake is recognized in depth, it is hard to say that the defendant suffers from a multi-pactal, hydro-pactal, nuclear escape certificate and disc change certificate, and suffers from health condition, and does not repeat again. However, the defendant has a history of having been sentenced to suspended sentence of imprisonment and fines for several times due to the same crime as the crime of this case, and the crime of arranging sexual traffic committed by the defendant is harmful to the good customs by commercializing women's sex, and therefore, it is highly harmful to society. Thus, there is a need to strictly punish the defendant in order to block sexual traffic suppliers and intermediarys. The defendant's business of arranging sexual traffic without permission of this case is the period during which the defendant conducts entertainment drinking club business and arranging sexual traffic, the size of the above entertainment tavern business and commercial sex business establishment, and other factors that the defendant caused each of the crimes of this case, such as motive and circumstance before and after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation, family relation, etc., and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records are too unfair.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.

(However, since it is clear that the "K" in Section 1-b (5) of the crime of the lower judgment is an erroneous entry of "L", it shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.