beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.09.30 2016고정1162

행정사법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a foreigner with the nationality of Pakistan who entered Korea with the status of stay (F-6-1) on September 18, 2011.

The Defendant became aware of the Defendant through the introduction of “D” to receive the above-mentioned visa, as a person who, upon request by a refugee applicant between the foreigners of Pakistanan nationality, would have been informed of other visa holders (G-1). The Defendant became aware of the introduction of “B” and “C” to receive the visa.

Except as otherwise permitted by other Acts, no person, other than a licensed administrative agent, shall engage in business of preparing documents, providing consultation and advice on administrative-related Acts and subordinate statutes and administration, and providing consultation and suggestions, etc. to the relevant agency with the authority delegated by a third person.

Despite the fact that the Defendant was not an administrative agent, on August 21, 2015, at a F cafeteria where it is impossible to ascertain the Etimes of Ansan-si, the Defendant changed the status of stay to other visa (G-1) and provided consultation on the methods, procedures, etc. for registering foreigners to change the status of stay to “B” and “C” and lent a stud lease agreement, which is a document submitted to the immigration control office, which is a document to the immigration control office, which is an administrative agency, and is a document supporting the physical kinds of documents required by the above agency. In order to register and change the status of stay, and permit the extension of the period of stay, the Defendant was required to receive an integrated application directly prepared by the Defendant from a public official in charge of immigration duties, and received a fee of KRW 800,000 per person.

Therefore, although the defendant is not a licensed administrative agent, the defendant has been engaged in the business of licensed administrative agent.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect B or C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of an application for refugee status, and a copy of a studio-lease agreement;

1. Article 36(1)1, Article 3(1)1, and Article 2(1)1 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment.