2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged 1) On June 20, 2016, the Defendant insultd the victim E by publicly citing that “If she listens to these two cases, she shall have them, she shall have them after gathering them,” while the F, who works for a string, such as the separation and removal of garbage in the apartment garbage separation and removal site of apartment.”

2) On June 22, 2016, the Defendant made a public insult of the said victim by openly insulting the said victim by saying that the victim D collected waste materials, etc. emitted from the apartment complex in front of the said apartment complex No. 708, 306, around June 22, 2016, on the ground that G, which is a 22 head of the Tong, was heard.

B. The Defendant also asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal, and the lower court found the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged, based on the evidence indicated in its judgment.

In light of the records of this case, a thorough examination of the above judgment by the court below is just and acceptable, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

subsection (b) of this section.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.