2. There is no reason to consider that the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected, and that the defendant's reference is not good.

However, the defendant not only had been punished several times, including punishment for the same kind of crime, but also had not been released from prison, and thus began to commit each of the crimes against many victims, the damage was not recovered, and the defendant did not receive a letter from the victims.

In addition, in full view of the fact that there is no significant change of circumstances for the first time, and the defendant's age, sex, intelligence and environment, the background leading to the crime of this case, the method and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable and it is not unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.