If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On October 18, 2018, at around 23:28, the Defendant posted the statement "E" on (E) Internet B, operated by the victim C, in the Defendant's residence located in Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu B, using comments, the Defendant posted the statement "E........ is the complete anti-Fraud group... It is the group that performs funeral as a store.. It is the same as a group that collects the store and plays. Maz., Maz., I do not keep any such victim in the future." At around 23:36 of the same day, the Defendant posted the statement "F..........." on the same day, the Defendant posted the statement "F..................." on the same day, the Defendant posted the statement "F........................" on the 23:00, the Defendant posted the statement "F........................................................”, the Defendant, the Defendant,”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police statement to I;

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant only stated only the facts on the Internet blogs, and that there was no insult of the victim, as to the Defendant’s assertion of J Blogs-flag, photograph, newspaper, promotional photo, and contract.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the expression “the anti-Fraud group”, “the group engaged in funeral services by gathering member shops,” “the representative’s horse”, and “the amount deposited in the same sound as the management dog by making a seal imprint affixed on the representative’s horse,” etc. are expressed as follows.