beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.10.16 2015재고합51

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and nine months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On February 3, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at Busan District Court on February 3, 2009; on July 18, 201, the Busan District Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny); and on November 14, 2012, the execution

【Criminal Facts】

1. On December 28, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime of December 28, 2012, around 08:40 on December 28, 2012, at the victim D’s house located in Busan Jin-gu C building 801, the Defendant: (a) opened a door door door of the victim’s house, which was not corrected by thefting the object, and intruded into the house; and (b) caused the theft of KRW 100,000 in cash owned by the victim on the book.

2. On January 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 02:02, on January 5, 2013, at the time of the Victim E’s house located in Busan High-gu C building 514, the Defendant: (b) opened the entrance door of the victim who was not corrected and intruded into the house; and (c) stolen KRW 60,000,000,000 in the market price of the victim’s KRW 1.5 million.

3. On February 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 13:10 on February 7, 2013, at the house of the Victim F, located in Busan High-gu C building 7.11, the Defendant: (b) opened the entrance door of the victim who was not corrected and intruded into the house; and (c) stolen KRW 200,000 in cash owned by the victim on the television line.

4. On February 9, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of February 2013, 2013: (a) around 08:00 on the Busan Jin-gu C building; (b) discovered the entrance door, which was not corrected, then intruded into the house in order to steals goods; and (c) opened the entrance door of 96 households in which the victim’s name-dissected persons reside from the 13th to 15th floor of the said officetel, but did not intrude into the house because the entrance was corrected, and thus, did not intrude into the house.

Accordingly, the Defendant habitually stolen or attempted to withdraw the victims’ property as above.

(i) the evidence;