beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.25 2016고단5302

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was between the victim B (n, 27 years of age) and the year.

1. On April 10, 2016, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) around 10:00 and around 10:00, the Defendant took alcohol with the victim’s residence; (b) was dissatisfied with the victim’s male relations; (c) was arguing that the victim’s male relations are doubtful; (d) the victim “whether he/she would report to the police”; and (e) was working on the part of the victim’s Samsung Ggalthing 6 base by cutting off smartphones owned by the victim, thereby damaging the repair cost of KRW 630,000.

2. On June 4, 2016, at around 12:50, the injured Defendant: (a) had a dispute with EMobur 601 in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City D; (b) caused the victim of a daily fishing vessel intending to go at home to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her

3. Intrusion upon residence;

A. On June 4, 2016, at around 17:30, the Defendant demanded the victim to open a door, setting up the door, and open the door. However, as the victim refused it, the Defendant opened the door with a beata window that was not corrected in excess of the fence due to the following parts of the building and intruded into the victim’s residence.

B. At around 22:19 on the same day, the Defendant opened a joint entrance door to the first floor of the city and opened the second floor of the victim’s residence on the ground that the victim does not have to have the right to remain in front of the victim’s residence, and invaded upon the victim’s residence by continuously opening the entrance door to 201, where the victim resides and avoiding disturbance for one hour.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Each photograph;

1. Each internal investigation report:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the letter of diagnosis of injury B;

1. Article 36, Article 257 (1) and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the occupation of an injury).