교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving a BD car.
On April 30, 2016, around 06:50, the Defendant came to turn to the left at a speed that is impossible to know one lane from the surface of Pyeongtaek apartment-ro, which is the right-hand road of 82, in front of the Ho-gu Incheon apartment, to the ocean and the surface of the abuse.
At the same time, there were frequent traffic of vehicles, and there were many vehicles parked on the surrounding road A, and thus, in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to look at the front side and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle and to prevent the traffic accident by accurately manipulating the operation of the brake and the steering system.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim C (the 62-year-old driver)'s lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-lick-k
As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer from an incurable disease, such as the impairment of the upper part of the upper part of the left side due to the foregoing occupational negligence.
2. The above determination is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.
According to the records, it can be recognized that the victim agreed with the defendant on September 7, 2017, which was after the prosecution and expressed his wish not to punish the defendant. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.