except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

On June 26, 2014, at around 00:30, the Defendant: (a) at around 00:30, the victim F (the 40-year-old) who was a police officer belonging to the E District Unit, called the E District Party in Gangdong-gu Seoul, after receiving the report of the assault case in front of the Dambrogate located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, was hacking the Defendant, and (b) the Defendant hacked the Defendant, hacking the victim’s police view and working clothes, hacking the victim over the floor, hacking the victim into the floor; (c) continuously hacking the victim’s timber above the floor, and hicked the victim’s hump, hump.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding suppression of crime, and at the same time, he blue blusium was in need of treatment for about 14 days to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Part concerning the rejection of prosecution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that one million won has been deposited for the police officer killed or wounded, the fact that there is no past record of punishment other than twice before and after the punishment of the same kind);

1. On June 26, 2014, around 00:30 on June 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim H (the age of 24) and I, the Defendant’s first-hand of the Defendant, in front of the Donode toilets underground located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu Seoul, to attach a vision; (b) when the victim’s face was taken out of the singing room and the hand room with the victim; (c) continuously shaking the bat; (d) when the victim’s face (the age of 46), which is the first-hand of the said victim’s line, boomed the bat; and (d) when the bat of the fat, the fat of the fat, which is the first-hand of the said victim’s line, b

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted victims.

2. This part of the facts charged is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express will in accordance with Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.