If the defendant does not pay the above fine,

1. On May 31, 2014, from around 22:35 to 22:55 on May 31, 2014, the Defendant saw 200 won per occupation by using 50 square meters from the office of the third floor F of the E market located in D at several times, and used 50 square meters on five occasions.

2. Violation of the Resident Registration Act, fabrication of private signature, and investigation and signature;

A. On May 31, 2014, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender of gambling at the above place on May 22:58, 2014, and the G police box was arrested as a flagrant offender of gambling, and the G police box was committed as if the Defendant had a resident registration number of the I (J) in order to verify the identity of the Defendant, and the above H used the I’s personal information by entering the I’s personal information in the arrest slip of a flagrant offender and using the I’s resident registration number unlawfully.

Afterwards, the above H presented a written confirmation stating the personal information of I, and the Defendant, without authority, forged the signature of I by stating “I” in the column for confirmation of the above written confirmation without authority for the purpose of exercising as I, and then submitted it to the above H as if it was duly constituted a forged letter of confirmation.

B. On June 1, 2014, around 01:25, the Defendant: (a) conducted an investigation in the criminal office and office of the Innman Police Station with respect to gambling suspects as one’s own name; and (b) forged I’s signature by stating “I” in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol in the name of I without authority for the purpose of exercising the right.

After that, the Defendant issued the above police station assistant K with a false signature as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning B and C;

1. A letter of arrest of a flagrant offender;

1. A certificate (I);

1. Examination protocol of suspect (I);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police seizure records;

1. Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense.