특수협박등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant of "2018 Highest 568" is a person who was administered from November 2017 in Busan Highest Maur D, which was operated by the victim B (n, 64 years of age).
On February 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) stated that the victim B, who had been viewed as drinking alcohol while running in the above telecom with the above telecom, expressed the victim B’s speech that “hinginging a drink with drinking alcohol at ordinary times,” and “hing the victim B with drinking alcohol at one time; (b) reported the victim B’s shoulder part with drinking alcohol; and (c) brought the victim B with the victim’s shoulder, which was a dangerous object on the part of the small air conditioners in the above sub-paragraph D room, with the victim’s hand, and threatened the victim B with the victim’s “hing with drinking alcohol and drinking alcohol” as “hing the victim’s hand.”
Ultimately, the Defendant carried dangerous objects as above and threatened the victim B.
around September 9, 2016, the Defendant, in collusion with E, even though he did not have an intention or ability to repay the principal and interest of the loan normally, purchased a ASEAN Q3 car in the used vehicle market located in Busan Southern-gu Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and obtained a loan of KRW 35 million from the victim H Co., Ltd. as security and agreed to pay the principal and interest in installments for 48 months each month, and acquired a loan of KRW 35 million from the victim Co., Ltd., and acquired it by fraud.
A public prosecutor has instituted a public prosecution to the effect that “a person was obtained from the injured party one vehicle above the market price of KRW 35 million,” but the victim H Co., Ltd. did not perform an act of disposal on a vehicle, and there is no room to regard that the person who has the right to dispose of the said vehicle was deceiving. Thus, it is different from the facts charged in this part to the extent that the identity of the basic facts is recognized.