The defendant is a social worker who works as the head of the D Center located in Gangwon-gun C.

Around 16:00 on February 11, 2016, E, working as a teacher at the above center, gave lessons to what he was sent out without permission from the victim F (son, 11 years old) who is a child attending the center office at the above center office, and the victim mixing E with her “Issssse in which Ise in which Ise you are mixed.”

Maternal qualification required to be mixed

Escopic scopic

The reason behind the judgment is as follows: “Isknife and Isknife”.

Defendant 1 reported that the injured person mentioned above at the above date, time, and place, and reported that the injured person mentioned above, the injured person was in the room in charge of the injured person, and gave guidance to the injured person and the injured person, and the injured person was able to see the injured person.

The phrase “the head of the victim was faced with the wall by pushing the victim’s head by hand.”

Accordingly, the defendant committed emotional abuse that harms the mental health and development of the victim, who is a child.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of site photographs, etc. of the case), investigation reports (Attachment of consultation with the victimized child), investigation reports (Attachment of consultation with the victimized child), investigation reports (Attachment of medical certificates);

1. Relevant Article 71 (1) 2 and Article 17 subparagraph 5 of the Act on the Place of Child’s Reinstatement for the crime, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination of the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence, and the Defendant and the defense counsel acknowledged the fact that the instant act was committed, but such an act does not constitute a “cruel act” under the Child Welfare Act.

The argument is asserted.

However, Article 3 (7) of the Child Uniforms Act provides that "child abuse" means physical and mental violence that may harm the health or welfare of a child or hinder the normal development of a child by adults, including his/her guardian.