A. 1) The Defendant’s conclusion of a sales contract is each land indicated in the “land acquired through consultation” column in the attached Table 1 list (hereinafter “each land of this case”).

As to the same list "contract Date" means the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter "Public Works Projects Act") between the plaintiffs who were their owners on the same date and each other.

(1) The agreement to acquire each of the instant lands through consultation (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant agreements”)

(2) On the other hand, the purchase price of each of the contracts of this case is as indicated in the “sale Price” column in the annexed Table 1 list, which is calculated on the basis of forest land category entered in each of the land of this case. Article 4(3) of each of the contracts of this case provides that “When the sale price has been set excessively or insufficiently due to an erroneous assessment of intentional negligence, etc., the Plaintiff and the Defendant may claim the excess or deficient amount to the other party, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant shall immediately pay or return the amount requested

B. 1) Each appraisal report of I, J, K, L, and M Co., Ltd. prepared around the time of each of the instant contracts is recorded as forest land. The current status of each of the instant lands is 1 A, N (1719/687), 6,877, 12.2, 12.22, 1, 453, 62, 253, 415.3, 66.7, 3, 206, 36.7, 713, 790, 790, 450, 412, 3445, 47, 450, 450, 450, 450, 261, 45, 265, 261, 36, 465, 208, 46, 205, 47, 2541, 475, 204