However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 5, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in Daegu District Court racing support.

1. On January 5, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) without a driver’s license of a motor vehicle on January 5, 2020, the Defendant driven the Fk seven motor vehicle at a distance of about 1km from C in front of C, which is under the influence of net alcohol concentration of 0.182%, to E in front of E, at the end of 1km.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. On January 5, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 01:45 p.m., reported a traffic accident on the front side of E, which was sent to the site; and (b) prevented the Defendant from driving under the influence of alcohol, etc.; (c) stated the name, resident registration number, etc. of I, who is a son, to identify the Defendant’s personal information, etc. in order to see the Defendant’s life while driving under the influence of alcohol and driving without a license, as if the Defendant was his birth, while driving under the influence of alcohol, as if he was the birth of the Defendant; (d) accordingly, the Defendant stated I’s name and private person in “the driver’s statement column of the report on the de facto statement of I”, which was written by H, and then

Accordingly, the defendant forged the signature of I for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

B. The Defendant above A.

As the blood alcohol level by pulmonary measurement was confirmed to be 0.135% in the course of the crackdown on drunk driving, such as the statement in the port, the blood alcohol level was claimed to collect.

On January 5, 2020, at K Hospital located in the J of 01:50,00, the Defendant saw as I on January 5, 2020, and entered I’s name and the private person in the column of “A consent to blood collection and confirmation” prepared by the above H in the column of “A consent to blood collection and confirmation,” and read I to H without knowledge of the aforementioned circumstances.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the signature of I for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving (I, A);

1. Consent to and confirmation letter of blood collection;