When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From around 2002, the Defendant is a person who is working as the well-known recognition of D in the Chungcheongnam-gun C.

On March 2010, the Defendant: (a) promised to implement D seafarers remodeling projects, which are state subsidies projects; (b) received subsidies equivalent to the total amount of construction cost in a manner that evades the payment of subsidies to traditional temples-related construction projects; and (c) received subsidies equivalent to the total amount of construction cost in fact, and received such subsidies from the Defendant to implement the said construction project.

Accordingly, the defendant had the intention to bear on behalf of the inspector on his behalf.

E (the same day of non-detained trial) requests construction to E, and G (the same day of non-detention trial) operating F Co., Ltd. lends the registration certificate of the repair business of cultural properties of the above company to E, and I (the previous trial before non-detention of the same day) subsidized E with the amount equivalent to the self-paid charges as non-funds created in advance from F Co., Ltd. F, and A submitted evidentiary documents to the office of Bupyeong-gun, in order to receive subsidies, as if the inspection had completed the inspection, and submitted evidentiary documents to E to the office of Pyeong-gun, to receive subsidies.

Accordingly, on March 10, 2010, the Defendant requested construction to E on the condition that he will pay for the self-paid charges, and on March 23, 2010, the Defendant applied for subsidies of KRW 180,000,000 (20% of the project cost) from the inspector, on condition that he will pay for the total project cost of KRW 225,00,000,000 (20% of the project cost) to the person in charge of the Mansan-gun-gun in charge of the said inspection, and applied for subsidies of KRW 45,00,000 among them, and E received subsidies of KRW 45,00,000 from F, and this year through H. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 22506, Sep. 14, 2010; Presidential Decree No. 22000, Sep. 30, 2014>

9. 15.15.15.15.15.00,000 won, total of 45,000,000 won, were returned to the defendant.

Since then, E does not include an amount equivalent to the person who actually performed the above construction work as the construction cost, and even though the actual construction cost was approximately KRW 176,103,00, the total construction cost was paid as if the total construction cost was paid KRW 221,103,00.