When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with B presses.

On November 14, 2014, at around 07:00, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and proceeded at the intersection of the Y-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri

At this point, it is a private street intersection with a signal apparatus.

A person engaged in the business of driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure that he/she is obliged to drive the motor vehicle in compliance with the signals as the signal apparatus is well reported to the intersection and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, due to negligence in contravention of stop signal, the part of the driver's wheeler of the victim C(the 76-year-old driver's seat) driving of the victim C (the 76-year-old driver's seat), who was proceeding to the left-hand side in accordance with the proceeding signals, was shocked with the front-hand part of the Defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, the victim C and the defendant's vehicle E (50 years of age, female) suffered scopic scopic scopics, etc. requiring two weeks of medical treatment through occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report, a traffic accident actual investigation report, and a medical certificate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Handling of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;