When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 1, 2018, the Defendant heard the Defendant’s statement to the effect that “When sending the check card with a daily deposit limit of at least 6 million won, the Defendant would give loans.” On June 19, 2018, the Defendant issued, at around 66:00, a copy of the check card and a password connected to the Defendant’s name bank account (B) by using the phone-based 697 delivery to the Defendant’s name bank account (B), using the phone-based 16:0 on June 19, 2018. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 25068, Jun. 19, 2018>

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to lend the means of access to electronic financial transactions in return for the benefit of the loan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of transactions detailed meetings, customer information inquiry table, and account entry transactions;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;