A, B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

except that this judgment.

The Defendants, together with a person whose daily name is not known as the victim of the telephone financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as the “scaming”), would provide a new loan to the victims when the said person pays part of the existing loan to the victims by telephone.

By making a false statement, the victims transfer money to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (J) with I's name for partial repayment of the loan, and continue to provide I with a loan by telephone.

In making a false statement, Defendant A and C intended to withdraw the money deposited in the passbook to make a loan by remitting money to the passbook and to deliver it to the designated person at a specific place. Defendant A and C intended to invite a person to deliver the money deposited in the passbook to the appropriate place. Defendant A and C intended to receive cash withdrawn from I only I at the above place and deliver it to singing daily. Defendant A and C had the police at the same state, moving route and surrounding areas while monitoring I, and to report it to sing daily, and Defendant D conspired to invite a person to deliver the money deposited in the passbook to sing daily.

Defendant

D Upon receipt of a proposal on May 2017, to offer 1% of the success amount at the face of the week to invite a person to deliver the amount of the interest-friendly payment of the Triishing damage from K for the payment of the amount of the Bosing damage.

6. 27. 경 평소 알고 지내던 피고인 B에게 “ 위 챗 (WeChat) 메신저 닉네임 ‘L’ 이라는 사람이 연락하여 시키는 대로 하면 100만 원을 수고비로 주겠다.

”라고 지시하였고, 이어서 보이스 피 싱 일당인 성명을 알 수 없는 사람( 위 챗 메신저 닉네임 ‘L’ 사용) 은 피고인 B에게 위 챗 메신저로 연락하여 울산에서 사람을 만 나 돈을 건네받은 후 서울 대림 역에 있는 환 전소로 가서 돈을 전달 하라고 지시하였고, 같은 일 당인 성명을 알 수 없는 사람( 위 챗 메신저 닉네임 ‘M’ 사용) 은 피고인 A, C에게 I을 감시하면서 거동 상태, 이동 경로 및...