2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and opposed to the mistake, and that the amount of damage is a relatively small amount.

However, the crime of this case is a case in which the defendant deceivings victims four times in the course of the crime of this case and acquired them through alcohol and speech. The defendant was punished several times due to the same crime, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and four months on July 18, 2013 and committed the crime of this case even after the execution of the punishment was completed on September 20, 2014, and even if he had been repeated period, he committed the crime of this case on September 20, 2014, and there was no submission of specific data about the victims' recovery from damage until the trial, and there was no record about the defendant's punishment for various crimes, such as theft, indecent act by force, intrusion of residence, assault, etc., the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, method and method of the crime, and circumstances after the sentence of the judgment below is considered as disadvantageous to the defendant. It is unreasonable to find the court below's sentence too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.