When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Around November 10, 2016, the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle in violation of an order to suspend the operation of the motor vehicle in violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act, and the Defendant operated the E-owned FNpppon vehicle registered as a motor vehicle to stop the operation on June 22, 2016, to the front day of the Gyeongcheon-si in the parking lot B located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Law Firm Dong in Seocho-gu, Seoul.

2. Around November 9, 2016, the Defendant was prohibited from operating a vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act on the road. Around November 10, 2016, the Defendant operated a vehicle described in paragraph 1, which is not covered by mandatory insurance from the law firm B located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul Seocho-gu) to the border of the Gyeongdong-si (Seoul Metropolitan City).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Details of comprehensive vehicle taxes;

1. Original Register of Automobile Registration;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Articles 82 subparagraph 2-2 and 24-2 (2) of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act (the point of operating an automobile with no mandatory insurance and the choice of a fine);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;