특수재물손괴등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
"200 Highest 24"
1. On October 12, 2019, the Defendant: (a) removed the registration number plate of the above D on the ground that pro-friendly D was not repaid the Defendant’s money at the Ulsan-gu Seoul Parking Lot; (b) discovered a vehicle owned by the victim B that was stopped at the same time while searching for the said D vehicle while finding out the vehicles, and then, (c) cut down both the front wheels of the said vehicle with a kacker, which is a dangerous object by misunderstanding the said D vehicle as a dangerous object; and (d) damaged the repair cost by removing it with a iron mon, which is an object dangerous to the front gate of the said vehicle, such as removing it from a iron mon, which is an object dangerous to the registration number plate attached to the said vehicle.
Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and damaged the property owned by the victim.
2. The Defendant: (a) discovered the victim D’s F vehicle that was stopped at a place specified in paragraph (1) for the same reason as stated in paragraph (1) at the time and place; and (b) destroyed the victim D’s vehicle with a knife, which is a dangerous object prepared in advance, so as to tear the front front and rear wheels of the said vehicle so that the repair cost can be increased.
Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and damaged the property owned by the victim.
No person shall lend a passbook, physical card, etc., which is a means of access necessary for electronic financial transactions, to any person who receives, demands or promises the payment.
Nevertheless, on December 2018, the Defendant: “The Defendant may lend KRW 5 million at a low interest rate of KRW 2-3 days from a person who misrepresented to G in the middle of 2018,” by telephone, to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense.” On the other hand, the Defendant’s crime is committed based on evidence to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of right to defense.