However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2013. 4. 30. 22:00경 성남시 분당구 C아파트 604동 2704호 소재 피해자 D의 집에서, 그곳 드레스룸에 있는 피해자 소유인 시가 30만원 상당의 가품 샤넬 핸드백 1개, 시가 50만원 상당의 가품 에르메스 검정색 핸드백 1개, 시가 300만원 상당의 까르띠에 여성용 손목시계 1개와 그곳 거실 소파 옆에 있는 시가 50만원 상당의 에르메스 파란색 핸드백 1개와 핸드백 안에 들어있던 시가 미상의 에르메스 스카프 1개를 피고인이 가지고 간 가방 등에 숨겨서 나와 이를 절취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Police seizure records and photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to reporting the occurrence of a crime, photographs at the scene of the crime, and CCTV-cap photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 329 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence include a criminal record for which the defendant was sentenced several times to a fine for the same kind of crime; however, considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime, committed the crime, repented, returned the stolen goods to the victim; and that the stolen goods are subject to hospitalized treatment due to shock, it shall be determined as ordered