대여금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 34,500,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 24, 2015 to February 25, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
1. According to the evidence No. 1 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff: (a) on September 15, 2014, deposited KRW 40,000 with the Defendant’s principal of KRW 3,00,000 on September 15, 2014; (b) on deposit basis of KRW 2,00,000 on September 15, 2014; (c) on deposit basis of KRW 1,00,000 on deposit basis; (d) on deposit basis of KRW 1,00,000 on September 22, 2014; (d) on deposit basis of KRW 30,00,000 on deposit basis; and (e) on deposit basis of KRW 1,00,000 on deposit basis before the maturity date; and (e) on deposit basis of KRW 30,50,000 on deposit basis of KRW 0,005,00 on deposit basis;
According to the above facts, since the defendant has lost the benefit of time due to the unpaid loan, the defendant is obligated to pay the loan amount of KRW 34,500,000 (=40,000-5,500,000) that has not been paid to the plaintiff and damages for delay at each rate of 5% per annum prescribed by the Civil Act from January 24, 2015 to February 25, 2015, the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, from January 24, 2015, to February 25, 2015, the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, and 20% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of
2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.