If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On February 1, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court on February 1, 2008, and a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court on September 26, 2008.

On April 20, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.101% of blood alcohol concentration on April 16:45, 2013, and the two-lane roads of the two-lanes in the 288-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, along the two-lanes of the two-lanes.

Since it is a road with a large traffic volume, it has a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service has a sufficient safety distance from the front and the front and the right and the right of the vehicle, and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently driven a vehicle at the string of the vehicle due to the negligence of driving the vehicle at the string of the vehicle (28 years of age) and received the following parts of the D Larento car from the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, who violated two or more times the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol, drives a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again. The Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, suffered from the victim E (the aged 28) who was on board the said rocketing motor vehicle for about three weeks, such as the erode of the erode of the light that requires approximately two-day medical treatment, the erode of the light that requires approximately ten-day medical treatment to the victim F (the aged 28), and the erode of the light that requires approximately two-day medical treatment to the victim G (the aged 28) for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Statement on the circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and settlement of traffic accidents;