However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 02:00 on the roads in front of Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon; (b) under the influence of alcohol, two strawers in front of the E- which was parked on the said roads without any justifiable reason; (c) two strawers attached to the said strawers; (d) two strawers attached to the above strawers; and (e) the strawers attached to the left window of the vehicle; and (e) forced removal of the strawer, which was attached on the left window of the vehicle; and (e) 2,661,934 won of the panel’s painting, etc. are damaged.

2. When the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender on the date, time, place, etc. set forth in paragraph 1 as mentioned above with the suspicion of damaging the said AWn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-C-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn

A. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant informed G police officers of F’s name and resident registration number (H), etc. on the front of the Dong-gu Daejeon Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, G, and confirmed that “In the event of arrest of a flagrant offender, he/she may appoint the gist of the police officer’s room, the reason for the arrest, and the reason for the arrest, and that he/she was given an opportunity to defend himself/herself upon receiving notification that he/she may request an arrest

After signing the above F’s signature in the confirmation letter stating “,” the above G police officers knew of that fact.

B. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the I branch office of the police station of the Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, 222, under investigation by the police officer J on the charge of property damage under paragraph (1); (b) inspected the protocol of examination of suspect prepared by the police officer and signed by the said F; and (c) sent the said police officer’s signature to the J, who is aware of such fact.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. The letter, confirmation, and arrest of a flagrant offender;