On July 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of injury at the Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Branch on April 9, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Jin prison.

On August 3, 2017, the Defendant collected a glass disease, which is a dangerous object to the victim, from the day of the victim C (16 years old) and the victim D (24 years old), who was in the vicinity of drinking and drinking, at the floor of the floor of the Yancheon-ro, Seocheon-do, Busan, Seocheon-ro, 1, Seocheon-do.

Accordingly, the defendant, carrying dangerous articles, and assaulted victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. On-site and suspect photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry into criminal history, report on investigation (report on the attachment of the same criminal records and the period of suspension of execution), copy of the judgment, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning personal confinement;

1. Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing Article 35 of the Aggravation of Aggravation of Cumulative Offense Act is a crime in which the defendant, without any special reason, led victims of a dangerous injury or disease, and the nature of the crime is not weak.

In addition, the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime and probation period for the same crime, and did not reach an agreement with the victims.

However, the defendant does not repeat the same mistake in the future as he reflects the mistake.

The punishment shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account the following factors, such as the fact that the victims often did not directly correspond to glass bottles, and the age, sex, family relationship, economic circumstances, etc. of the defendant at the trial of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, economic conditions, etc.