Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Defendant

A is a person who operates a stock company B in Busan Jung-gu, and imports construction materials such as others and sells them in Korea.

Defendant

B is a corporation that is engaged in trade of construction materials such as another day in which the defendant A is the representative director.

1. No customs duty rate shall be falsely declared in order to affect the determination of the amount of customs duties while importing goods from a foreign country Defendant A;

Nevertheless, Defendant A had the intent to lower the rate of duty and import by falsely reporting the actual Chinese production plant, as if it is a medium country to be subject to anti-dumping measures, such as 16.07% of the 16.07% of the 16.07% of the 16.07% of the 16.07% of the 16.26% of the 10.26% of the 10.26% of the 10.

Defendant

A around December 14, 2009, in importing products equivalent to US$ 760 square meters and US$ 7,068 (8,269,631 won) of the Republic of Korea among China, China, from among importation declaration region around December 14, 2009, the actual producer of the product is China, which is subject to the 13.33% of the Republic of Korea, but is the product produced by "H" subject to the 3.97% of the Republic of Korea, with a false certificate of producer as if it were the product produced by "H", which is equivalent to 9.36% of the tax rate of KRW 9.36%, from that time to April 23, 2014, the product was produced with a false certificate of producer, and from that time, up to 120 times in total, subject to high-quality anti-made measures (16.07%, etc.), such as the description of "customs tariff evasion schedule," "K," "L," "A" "H," "M," "M," "M," "M," "M,".