When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall leave Articles on the road which impede the traffic flow of the road without permission therefor.

However, at around 23:05 on October 12, 2016, the Defendant, while driving a golf car at the Han-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon Wol-gu, Daejeon, caused an accident where the part on the right-hand side of the above road is collisioned with the part of the Defendant’s car on the right-hand side of the Defendant, and left the above car on the road as it is on the above road and left it on the accident site, and left it on the road, which is an object that may interfere with traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A traffic accident report and accident site photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Article 152 of the relevant Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 4 and 68 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion against the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order

It is difficult to see

Therefore, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated, the defendant found and parked the police officer of drinking control at the location of this case, and escaped from the opposite direction of the point where drinking is controlled without any measure after he was fluened, and the defendant left without any measure. The defendant's point where the car was left alone can be acknowledged that the driver of the road of one-lane road (which is not the side length) has controlled that the landscape dispatched to the site at night would pass through a light-light, and according to the above facts of recognition, the charge of this case is sufficiently recognized. Thus, the defendant and the defense counsel's assertion is not accepted.

It is advantageous to the fact that there is no criminal history that there is no reason for sentencing, but there is an accident that makes it difficult to regulate drinking.