When the Defendant was investigated as a suspect of the crime of acquiring stolen goods that he purchased from C and D one million won in the market price of the E-owned land, which he acquired from C and D, as the criminal suspect of the crime of acquiring stolen goods, the Defendant was able to look at the F Doctrine, by threatening to clarify the facts of the public educational official.

Around 18:00 on February 15, 2013, the Defendant completed an investigation at the investigation and statement recording room of the Kimpo Police Station located in the long-term Dong, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and entered the “F” in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol using the color pen, and submitted the suspect interrogation protocol to G police officers who are not aware of the forgery of the above signature.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the F's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Instructions to make a report on the re-preparation, such as drilling of corrected materials based on personal chart;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation material cards;

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature) and Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Eight months of imprisonment to be suspended;

1. Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence of sentence of the Criminal Act concerns that the defendant's wall purchased by the defendant as a public educational official will suffer disadvantages when his identity is clarified, and thus, he first signed the protocol of interrogation of suspect under F and was not intended to commit a crime, and there are some circumstances to consider the crime of this case. In the case of the crime of this case, even if the suspended sentence is sentenced, the defendant may be retired from office even if he is sentenced to a suspended sentence of punishment, and the crime of uttering of private document or private document of investigation is more severe punishment.