beta
(영문) 특허법원 2006.4.6.선고 2005허1844 판결

등록무효(실)

Cases

205Heo1844 (Invalidation of Registration)

Plaintiff

1. Kim Sang-hoon

2. Kim Jong-Un

Plaintiffs’ Address

[Defendant-Appellant] Defendant 1 et al.

Defendant

Maximum-ray

Busan

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 9, 2006

Imposition of Judgment

April 6, 2006

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Purport of claim

A request for utility model registration from among a trial decision rendered by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on January 28, 2005 by the case No. 2003Da1247

Part of paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of this Act shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Details of the trial decision on the defendant's application for nullification of registration;

[Evidence] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6

A. Details of the instant registered petition and comparative petition (1) Plaintiffs’ registered petition

(1) Name: A light for the protection of pedestrians at crosswalks.

② Right holder: Plaintiffs (Plaintiff 2, who transferred part of the right to Plaintiff 1 to Plaintiff 1, and on February 4, 2005.

(Registration)

③ The filing date / the registration date / the registration number: On July 11, 2001, the summary of the registered appeal (No. 251754): ① The lighting lighting for the convenience of pedestrians installed on the previous crosswalks is to go to the above crosswalks, and thus, the substantial part of the light is to go to the driver on the crosswalks, and the driver’s view is difficult to identify pedestrians, thereby causing the above accident on the crosswalks. ④ The registered appeal of this case is designed to effectively protect pedestrians on the crosswalks by blocking light from the source to the driver’s view and to concentrate on it to pedestrians, thereby protecting pedestrians in accordance with the road conditions, and to provide a lighting for the structure, etc. to facilitate the replacement of remuneration and replacement of the inside section, and the detailed description and composition of the registered appeal of this case are the same as the claims in the attached Form 1.

(2) As shown in Attachment 2, the comparable proposal is as shown in Annex 2.

B. On June 13, 2003, the defendant filed a petition for a registration invalidation trial on the ground that the above registered device could have been easily designed by the comparison design 1 and 2. The Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered a trial decision on January 28, 2005 on the ground that the device of paragraphs 1 and 2 in the registered device of this case could have been easily created by a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field under the comparison design 1 and 2, and the device of paragraph 4 can be easily created by a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field under the comparison design 1 and 2, and thus the non-obviousness is not recognized. Thus, the registration should be invalidated as it falls under Article 5(1) and 5(2) of the Utility Model Act, and the device of paragraph 3 of this Article cannot be easily designed by a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field, even by the comparison design, and thus, the non-obviousness cannot be recognized.

2. Summary of the plaintiff's ground for revocation

가. 이 사건 제1항 고안은 다음과 같은 이유로 그 기술분야에서 통상의 지식을 가진 자가 비교대상고안들에 의하여 아주 쉽게 고안할 수 있는 것이 아니다 . ( 1 ) 제1항 고안은 횡단보도 위에 설치되어 보행자를 보호하고 교통사고를 예방하기 위한 목적을 갖는 반면, 비교대상고안 1은 가로등의 불빛이 발산되는 각도를 조절하여 농작물의 수확량 감소나 조종사의 시야방해를 해결하고자 하는 것이고, 비교대상고안 2는 제어가능한 등 커버를 갖는 고정기구에 관한 것으로 그 대상과 목적이 다르다 . ( 2 ) 제1항 고안의 구성요소 중 ' 금구 ' ( 20 ) 는 신호등 철주의 가로대 ( 100 ) 에 본체를 부착하기 위해 본체 전후방 측벽 상단부에 결합되는데, 비교대상고안 1에는 이에 대응하는 구성이 없다. 제1항 고안의 ‘ 차단판 ( 30 ) 은 본체 한쪽에만 설치되며 절첩구조 ( 折帖構 造 ) 로 이루어져 있는 반면에, 비교대상고안 1의 집광판 ( 200 ) 은 상부하우징 ( 100 ) 의 외부에 장착되어 일체로 결합되는 제1, 2 날개 ( 210, 230 ) 로 이루어져 있어 구성 및 작용효과가 서로 다르다 .

(3) While the Parag. (1) device has a significant effect on allowing pedestrians to prevent traffic accidents on the crosswalk by allowing light such as light for pedestrian protection, not toward the driver of the vehicle, but toward the pedestrian, the comparative design 1 allows street light to be concentrated in the target area by controlling the angle emitted from the street, etc., so such effect does not begin or suggest at all.

B. The instant Claim 2 design is composed of metal interior (13a) strings (13b) strings (13) by inserting strings (13b) into the inner side of the strings so as to facilitate the replacement of remuneration and replacement of the inside strings in pedestrian protection lighting, etc., and is composed of brings (13C) combining the strings (13C) into the rear and front side of the body, thereby forming a combination of brings (13C) into the rear and front side of the body, so that the strings can shut down with a strings combined with both sides. However, the strings (13C) on the upper and lower side of the strings cannot be easily designed by a person who has ordinary knowledge in the art.

C. The instant Claim 4 design is composed of two parts that combines the inner plane (32) to the lower part of the outer plane plate (33) which combines this bomet (30) in the form of “1” and combines this bomet to the outer plane plate (32) whose inner plane angle is different from the outer side of the inner plane board (32) and combines it with a comb (31) before and after the body so that the overlapping angle is adjusted. However, the comparative Claim 2 merely started a cover that adjusts the angle of light by bom or V, and its purpose, composition, and effect are mutually different, and it is not easy to easily be designed by bomet 1 and 2.

3. Whether the registered device can be easily designed on the basis of the comparable device;

A. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the following facts are recognized as to the determination of a claim 1 device (1) in comparison with the technical field and purpose of technology Gap (a) in comparison with the statements of evidence Nos. 4, 5, and 6:

(1) The purpose of the design of paragraph (1) is to provide lighting lights that can effectively protect pedestrians on the crosswalks by installing a blocking board with an overlapping structure on the main body of lighting lights to block light to drivers at night and by allowing light to be concentrated toward pedestrians. ② The purpose of the comparative device is to provide lighting lights that can regulate the degree of light emitted from street lights by putting a light board on the road or the street installed on the runway of an airport; ② The purpose of the comparative device is to provide street lights that can regulate the degree of light emitted on the outer side of the street, etc. by putting the light board on the outer side of the road or airport runway; ③ The comparative device 2 is related to the fixed apparatus, such as those with a sticker, etc.

(B) According to the above facts, lighting of the device in paragraph (1) is set up on the crosswalk for the protection of pedestrians, and the street lamps, etc. in the comparable device 1 are set up on the road or the airport runway, and the fixed organization, such as the comparative device 2, etc. is set up in the sports stadium, and there is a difference between the objects or places of installation. However, all the above devices are related to lighting fixtures used to identify a specific area at night, and there is no difference between the basic element and its mutual connection structure as seen below in comparison with the composition. Thus, it is deemed that the device in paragraph (1) and the comparative device are included in the same technology.

In addition, the device of paragraph 1 is installed in the main body of lighting, etc., the comparative device 1 is installed in the upper top of street etc., and the comparative device 2 is installed in a fixed body, such as the comparative device 2 is installed with a cover. The above device has the same professional engineer standing that the light should be concentrated toward the target area, and the purpose of the above device is also the same.

(2) The component 1 of paragraph (1) of the comparison for composition (A) is “a structure installed in front of lighting (11) and half-board (12) on the inside side of the main body of 10)” and this is “a structure installed in front of lighting (11) on the part of street lamps (100)” in paragraph 1 of the comparison for comparison.

A structure installed on the inside side of the device (114) and half-boards (116), “a structure installed on the inside side of the device (18),” and “a structure installed on the inside side of the fixed device (10), etc. (18), and reflective (16)” are corresponding to “a structure installed on the inside side of the fixed device (10),” and “a structure installed on the inside side of the body of the lighting body (10). The composition responding to the device performs the function of setting up inside the body of the lighting body and causing light generated in a certain direction, and reflect light in a certain direction.

(B) 2 of the element of paragraph (1) of this Article is “a structure installed at the inner lower part of the device.” This is compared to “a structure concluded at a transparent glass level (122) of the upper part (110)” and “a structure installed at the comparative part 2 of the device “(20) so as to put the inner side, etc. into the front part of the anti-Fraud (22)” in the comparative part 1, the comparative part 1, “a structure established at the lower part of the device (110)” and “a structure installed at the same time to put in the front part of the device (22). The composition corresponding to the device consists of transparent glass so that the light of the front part can be effectively administered. However, while the front part (13) of the device was strengthened, it is not clearly indicated that the front part of the comparative part (20) has the characteristics of the comparative part or the front part of the device prior to its reinforcement.”

C) The elements of paragraph 1 device 3 are “a structure consisting of gold holess (20) to attach the body above at the upper end of the steel pole (100) before and after the body of the body.” This is not clearly indicated in paragraph 1 device 2 of the comparable device “a structure installed in a fixed apparatus (12) or any other supporting structure by (11) and at the end of (11) of the fixed apparatus (12)”, and the comparable device 1 does not clearly state the structure corresponding thereto. In other words, “gold tool” (20) is combined with the front and rear side wall of the body of the body of the body of the case, while the combined location of the comparable device 1 is not specified, and the combined location of the comparable device 2) is not specified in the latter part of paragraph 1 of the comparable device.

However, according to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 4 and 5, the detailed description of the registered complaint in this case includes the detailed description about the combined structure that makes it possible to adjust the angle of attachment with the main body by Geum-gu (20) or KV (25). However, the claims in paragraph (1) of the utility model registration claims do not limit the shape and structure of the metal hole specifically, but only include the "to attach the main body to the steel pole" as the connected absence. The drawings in the comparative complaint No. 1 are urbanized (110 degrees No. 1 of Gap evidence No. 5). According to the above facts, the "design No. 1" of paragraph (1) contains only the connected absence of the main body to attach the main body to the steel pole such as lighting, etc., so it is not significantly different from the comparison of the main body to the main body of the street pole No. 1.

In addition, the difference in the combined location between the gold section (20) and section 1 of the comparable high section 2 of the comparable high section (12) has little impact on the operating effect of attaching the main body of the lighting fixture to street or support stand. As such, the component element 4 of paragraph 1 of paragraph 1 of this Article is “the structure installed in this section with an overlapping structure (30) on the daily side of the main body,” and this is “the structure installed in this section (110)” in Section 1 of the comparable high section 1, the combination location of Section 2 of the comparable high section (12) is nothing more than the extent that a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the proposal pertains can easily change the main body as necessary.

In response to the anti-Fraud (16) of this case, the blocking board (30) of the device of this case (1) is installed only on one side of the main body and consists of an overlapping structure with the main body. However, while the concentration board (200) of the comparison table (200) consists of 1,2 days (210,230) combined with the outer part of the upper upper part (10).

According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 4 and 5 and the entire arguments, ① 30 sheets (31) of the instant Claim Nos. 1 are combined with the front and rear side of the main body by amV (31) and amV (31).

심으로 차단판 ( 30 ) 을 본체에 대하여 접었다 펼 수 있는 절첩구조 ( 折帖構造 ) 로 설치되어 있는 사실, ② 비교대상고안 1의 집광판 ( 200 ) 은, 경첩 ( H ) 에 의하여 상부하우징 ( 110 ) 의 하단에 장착되어 있으며, 제1, 2 날개 ( 210, 230 ) 가 서로 연통하는 원호형상의 가이드공 (218, 220, 238, 240 ) 에 삽입된 체결볼트 ( 124, 128 ) 및 체결볼트와 결합되는 너트 ( 126 , 130 ) 에 의하여 절곡부 ( 214, 216, 234, 236 ) 의 일부가 서로 겹쳐지면서 일체로 결합되어 있어 체결볼트 ( 124, 128 ) 를 중심으로 제1, 2 날개 ( 210, 230 ) { 또는 제1, 2 차단판 ( 212 , 232 ) } 를 서로 대향하도록 접거나 펼 수 있는 구조인 사실이 인정된다 .

According to the above facts, even though the composition corresponding to both devices differs from the main body of the device in paragraph (1) or between the main body of the device in paragraph (1) and the main body of the comparative device 1, 1, 2-day joints of the main body of the main body or the main body of the 1, 2-day joints of the 1, 2-day joints of the 1, 2-day joints of the main body or the upper body of the 1, 2-day joints of the 1, 2-day joints of the 1, 2-day joints of the 1, 2-day joints of the 1, 2-day joints of the 1, 2-day joints of the 1, 2-day joints

In addition, the blocking board (30) of the device in paragraph (1) is installed only in the main body, so that the light of lighting that leads to one direction can be cut off. On the other hand, the integrated light (200) of paragraph (1) of the comparable device 1 can easily block only the light of a specific direction, such as the device in paragraph (1), by selectively regulating only one day in the direction of blocking light among the 1 and 2 days compared to each other, while the 1 and 2-day (210,230) combined with a part of the string on both sides of the upper top (100) combined with a string, the 1 and 2-day (210,230) combined with a single unit. However, even in the comparable device 1, the 1 and 2-day group can easily block light generated in the direction of blocking light.

(3) Preparation for effects of action

The instant Claim 1 design has the effect of effectively protecting pedestrians on the crosswalk by putting a stop board on the main body of the crosswalk lighting, and controlling the overlapped angle of the main body of the body so that light from sources to drivers can be cut off, and the light is concentrated toward pedestrians, thereby effectively protecting pedestrians on the crosswalk. Meanwhile, the comparative device 1 has the effect of concentrating light in the direction of blocking and outer direction by putting a light board equipped with 1,2 days (1,2 blockings) on the upper upper upper part of the street, etc., and by controlling the angles of the first, second (1,2 blockings) of the upper upper part, etc., by putting a light angle generated from the street, etc., and controlling the angles of the light from the upper part. Moreover, the comparative device 2 can be concentrated into the direction of blocking and outer part of the light by putting the light covered between the location of blocking and the location at which the light is cancelled.

Therefore, the effect of the design of Paragraph 1 can be sufficiently predicted in 1 and 2 of the comparative design.

Therefore, the device of paragraph 1 is identical or similar to the comparative device 1, 2, and its technical field. Although the composition of the gold bullion of the device of paragraph 1 differs from the structure corresponding to the comparative device 1 and 2, the difference in its composition is merely a degree that is extremely easy to change through simple design changes. The effects of the device of paragraph 1 can also be sufficiently predicted in the comparative device 1 and 2.

Ultimately, the design of Paragraph 1 is judged to be easily designed by a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the registered device of this case belongs, by means of the design 1 and 2.

B. Preparation for a determination of paragraph 2(1)(i)

The design of Paragraph 2 of this case is a subordinate claim 1 citing Paragraph 1 of this case, and "(13) is composed of a combination of 10 square meters (13b) and 10 square meters (13c) in this body by inserting strings (13b) into the inner side of metal interior, and is a combination of 130 square meters (13c) in the front and front side of the body, which is composed of 20 square meters combined with 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00).

However, the technology attached to the front of the main body of the lighting body by means of the combination of brackers directly or by cutting a cover or a bracker, which protects the internal lighting tools in the lighting body, is merely a technology already widely known and used prior to the filing of the instant application. Furthermore, even prior to the comparison design 1, there has been a public announcement of the composition combining sub-sponse with sub-sponse by the means of conclusion, and it is obvious that the means of conclusion here include sub-sponse.

In addition, the 2nd device is composed of Naba, which is formed in the front and the Naba, which is combined with both sides, so that the luba can open the lubane by forming a fixed metal theme through the rear and the front center of the main body, while there is a difference between the 1 and 2nd of the comparative device and the conclusion structure not specified in detail.

However, prior to the filing of the instant application, the technologies that can be able to fix the protection cover to the main body by combining the protection cover or the protection cover of the lighting gear in the lighting fixture, and to remove the protection cover only with only one location, are merely widely known and used technologies, or it is determined that the composition of an open area which combines submersion with submersion by the means of conclusion of the comparative device 1 can be formed by simply modifying the composition of the open area.

(2) Preparation for effects

The device of Paragraph 2 is fixed by the combination between the two sides of the front and three points in the center of the front body of the front body, so it is possible to open the front of the front body of the front. In case of the replacement or repair of the inner lighting apparatus, it is possible to open the front of the lighting apparatus in a state supported by the main body. Therefore, it is possible to easily and easily carry out the replacement or maintenance or repair of the lighting apparatus at a high place.

However, as in the preparation for the above composition, as long as the technology attached to the body by combining the protection covers or the protection coverss of the lighting gear and releasing the protection cover only in one location is widely known or it is a technology that can simply modify the safety from the publicly known technology, its effects can also be sufficiently predicted.

Therefore, it is determined that the second device can be easily designed by a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the registered device of this case belongs, pursuant to the comparative design 1 and 2.

C. (A) Claim 4 is a subordinate claim citing any of Claim 1, 2, or 3. However, as seen earlier, the nonobviousness of Claim 1, 2, or 4 is not recognized, first of all, examining whether the non-obviousness of Claim 4 in the part citing Claim 1 or 2 is recognized.

(B) The design of paragraph 4 is characterized by “a snick metal plate (30) is cut off in the form of “1” and a combination is made so that the two parts can be combined by means of a reduction V (31) at the lower part of the front and rear side of the main body, so that the snick angles can be adjusted for the main body centering on a reduction V, and the said snick board is made up of the outer blocking board (32) and the outer blocking board (33) combined with each other fixed on the outer side.”

The characteristics of the device in paragraph 4 are as follows: “(200) is installed on the outside side of upper (110) by tampers (H); (2) is as follows; (3) is as follows; (4) is as follows: (1); (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (3) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (3) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (4) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (2) is as follows; (3) is as follows; (1) is as follows; (2) is as follows; and (4) is as follows; and (2) is as follows; and (4) is as follows:

(C) The above components (1) are in the shape of "(30)", "(1) 1 and 2 days of the integrated light board (200) of the comparable 4(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s))(s)(s)(s))(s)(s))(s))(s)(s))(s)(s))(s)(s)))(s)(s))(s)(s))(s)(s))(s)(s)))(s)(s))(s)(s)(s)(s))(s)(s)(s))(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s.

However, although there is a little difference in the shape of the elements of the comparable device corresponding to the blocking board (30) of the device of paragraph 4, this difference is considered to be possible to change its composition through simple design changes.

(2) Preparation for effects

Paragraph 4 (Exclusion from Part 3 citing Claim) has the effect of effectively protecting pedestrians on the crosswalk by properly regulating the anti-gradation of light of lighting in the lighting range and by regulating the anti-gradation of light to drivers by properly regulating the anti-gradation of light of lighting in the lighting range and by excluding part citing Claim 3) in organizing a light light for the crosswalk at the crosswalk. However, as examined in comparison with the above structure, 1, 2 is attached to the body of the lighting body, and 2 (26) so that each light can be controlled in the same manner as a device without putting in place three anti-gradicities in the light range.

Therefore, the claim 4 (excluding the part citing the claim 3) is deemed to be easily designed by a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the registered device of this case belongs by comparison 1 and 2.

However, in our country adopting Paragraph (1) with regard to the scope of a request for registration of a utility model, where there are two or more claims for utility model registration, each claim may be invalidated (Article 49(1) of the Utility Model Act). However, in cases where some of the claims for registration of a utility model falls under the scope of a prior art, and there are grounds for invalidation of registration, such as where some of the claims for registration of a utility model falls under the scope of a prior art, the entire claim shall be invalidated unless it is deemed that the prior art, etc. is closely combined with any other part recognized as non-obviousness, and only a part of the claims for registration of a utility model shall not be invalidated (Supreme Court Decision 90Hu1567 delivered on April 15, 194).

Therefore, the part citing paragraphs (1) and (2) among the claims 4 is not recognized as non-obviousness, and it cannot be deemed that the part citing paragraph (3) among the claims 4 is organicly combined with the part citing paragraph (4). Accordingly, the entire claim 4 is null and void pursuant to Article 5(1) and (2) of the Utility Model Act.

Thus, the design of paragraphs 1, 2, and 4 of this case is not recognized as non-obviousness by the comparative idea 1 and 2, and its registration should be invalidated. Accordingly, the trial decision of this case, which concluded as above, is legitimate, and the plaintiff's claim seeking revocation of the trial decision is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

Judges Cho Jae-ho

Judges Doing-type

Judges Seo Young-gu

Site of separate sheet

[Attachment 1]

Plaintiff’s registered petition

(a) The scope of the request for utility model registration (which is confirmed by a technology evaluation decision on February 28, 2003);

1. Claim 1 (11) A long-term steering force and half-boardboard (12) a part of the main body of the claim (10) and (12) a long-term steering force; and

(1) At the lower part of the side of the vessel, 1.5 Maderns (13) consisting of steel glass, Maderns (13)

(hereinafter referred to as "entent 2") and the upper part of the side wall before and after the main body of the body on the iron pole (100).

(20) combinations of gold cells (20) to attach the body of the State, (hereinafter referred to as "class 3") and the body of the State;

With a structure (30) of a block board (hereinafter referred to as "class 4") to be established on the side of the counter-structure;

Section 1 of this case, which is characterized by Section 1, is a light for the protection of pedestrians (hereinafter referred to as "the first device of this case").

(c).

2. In regard to claims 1, an electric Lightinger (13) shall have strengthened glass on the side of metal theme (13a).

(13b) incorporates Nasa (13c) into this body and incorporates Nasa (13c) into two sides of the body; and

Naba formed on the front by organizing to fix metal theme through the center of 3 points in front.

The Gu shall ensure that Naschers combined with the two sides can open and close Maschers

Section 2 of this case hereinafter referred to as "the second device of this case") is a light for the protection of pedestrians at crosswalks with the characteristics of the nature of the

(d).

3. In Claim 3. In paragraph 1, the gold-gu (20), in the form of "a" (21), and the above-mentioned main line;

E. (22) No date (23) as concluded by V, and no date for the absence of such date shall be immediately placed in any manner.

Modern (24) in a single unit, and the two groups of the foregoing Modern (21) shall be the front and rear top of the body.

any combination that is concluded by the reduction V (25) and that is capable of controlling the angle of attachment between the body and the gold-gu;

and date absences shall be concluded at V (22) with a chromatic mV (26) with a chromatic knife

It shall be possible to adjust the level of combination between the bund and the bundle by changing the location of the conclusion of a V.

for the protection of pedestrians at crosswalks with characteristics of consisting of section 3(hereinafter referred to as "the case

The term "a device" means a device.

4. In any of the claims in paragraphs 1, 2, or 3, a snick board (30) shall be set aside.

in the form of Section 1 'A' and the two parts of which are reduced at the lower part of the front and rear side of the body of the body (31).

by organizing a combination so that it may regulate overlapping angles on the main body centering around a stable-V.

Ademblings, all of which are fixed on the inner side (32) and on the outer side with each of the Dos.

A light for the protection of pedestrians in crosswalks with characteristics consisting of external side blockings (33)

(hereinafter referred to as "the Claim 4 device of this case").

(b) Drawings;

Do 1 Do 2

A person shall be appointed.

Do 3 Do 4

A person shall be appointed.

Do5Do6

A person shall be appointed.

[Attachment 2]

Compared Gos

1. Comparison design 1 (Public Notice No. 190898, August 1, 2000, Evidence No. 5)

A. A summary of the device

Preliminary design 1 is a device related to "roadlights on which a blight plate is installed" and its summary is a claim.

As set out in paragraph 1, “The upper part (110) holding the body form open to the lower part,” as set out in paragraph 1 above.

To be installed on the side of upper margin (110) in a half cover (16) and in a speet (114) in which a mar (114) is entered into, and the above:

upper margin (110) and against the contrary, have a form open to the upper margin, and upper margin by the means of conclusion.

(110) On the street, etc. (100) with the lower part of the sub-paragraph (122), which is concluded at the bottom of sub-paragraph (110), the upper part above.

Hadar (110) Hadar on the outer side of the longer river and has a prescribed slope and extended to the lower side.

part of the board (212), the first cut board (212), shall be drawn up in a vertical manner on the part of the day of the above 1 cut board (212), and No. 1 put in the original form

public. (218) At the other side of Section 1 (214) and of Section 1 (212) above, the above-mentioned heading

Section 2 A. B.D. (220) of the same section as the 1A. (218) above is e.g. heading in opposite to section 214,00,000,000

Section 2, Section 2 (216), the first day (210), and the second day (110) of the above upper limit; and

Sheeted on the upper side of the uppermost and extended to the lower side (232);

Section 2(232) above is unreshed on the part of the day, and corresponding to Section 1A(218) above.

at the other side of Section 3 (234) and Section 2 (232) above formed Gai No. 3 (238).

Section 3 (234) and Section 4A corresponding to Section 2 A above (220).

D. (240) Doz. (230 Doz.) Doz. (230 Doz.) Doz. with a sign indicating that 2-day (230) is included

Ro-ro, etc. “.”

(b) Drawings;

Do 1 Do 2

100

A person shall be appointed.

2. Comparison Claim 2 (Patent Gazette No. 1999 - 7789, January 25, 1999, Evidence No. 6)

A. A summary of the device

Preliminary 2 is a device related to "a fixed apparatus, such as with a stringer, such as control available,"

The summary of the claim is, as described in paragraph 1, the “sufficient insignia or its adjacent insignia”.

mining to reach – including the source of light requiring a period of time, and, once, its initial setting - the period of business;

upon completion of this study, the Corporation may promptly control the fluence while maintaining the insignia from the above sources.

as a fixed body, such as insignias, the absence to be installed, and the light source installed in the absence to be installed, and the foregoing part to be installed.

be installed in J. and from such sources to the outside side of the said fixed body;

Anti-Frauds that limit the openings and are set up in the above fixed body, the first location, and such reflectors

Between the two locations closed of the openings of the Gu, and cover with a closed hole

A fixed body, including an absentee, is a fixed body, such as ancient insignias.

(b) Drawings;

Do1

A person shall be appointed.