beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.10.25 2018고단1988

사기등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months;

Seized evidence 2, 10 shall be confiscated.

2. Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The organization of telephone financing fraud in which Defendant A participated by Defendant A is to give loans to many and unspecified persons in need of urgency or lending by putting a phone to an unspecified number of persons;

It is an organization that acquires money by means of transferring money under the pretext of money lending, low interest loan brokerage, etc.

The above organization takes charge of the crime of transferring money to a borrowed-name account to be used for the crime by phoneing to an unspecified number of victims (hereinafter referred to as the "defluence passbook"), the collection of the passbook and the check card to be used for the crime, and delivery to the high-tier co-offenders such as the withdrawal book by collecting the above card, and then withdrawing the money by taking over the check money deposited in the account from the cash withdrawal machine of the financial institution in Seoul metropolitan area from the above card collection book, and then deliver the remittance book to the remittance book, and then transfers the withdrawn money by receiving the card from the above card collection book to the withdrawal book, and operates it in the form of a tracking organization in preparation for the investigation agency.

On July 2018, the Defendant sent from the Defendant’s name and influence (hereinafter “D”) to the account informing the Defendant of the withdrawal and reception of funds from the Defendant, which is the cause of the instant Boscing organization, to which the Defendant reported and contacted the job offers of the Internet Twit Job Job Job Seeking Site.

It would pay 2% of the money deposited on the face of the transfer to the next designated account after collecting the e-mail card delivered at home and withdrawing the cash deposited in the connected account.

“At the time of the proposal, the proposal served as a means of collecting cards, withdrawing books, and remitting books according to the direction of the person who was not entitled to the above name.

The defendant did not know at all his personal information and did not properly explain the company's work.