손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On August 22, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) around 14:30 on August 22, 2012, the Defendant’s second floor “D” restaurant of the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seoul Special Metropolitan City building C, put the Cheongp, which is the site of the Cheongp, into the Tongp; and (b) brought the images on the Cheongp Bureau, which had been driven by many people at the entrance
Since the Defendant violated the Plaintiff’s duty of safety consideration as the employer, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for damages of KRW 21,00,000 out of the total sum of KRW 27,689,194, daily income, future treatment expenses of KRW 192,760,00,000, among the total sum of KRW 10,000,000, as the non-performance, tort, or the part possessor of the restaurant among the above buildings where defects in installation or preservation exist.
2. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone alone violated the Defendant’s duty of safety consideration against the Plaintiff.
Since it is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff suffered bodily injury due to defects in the installation and preservation of the above restaurant or the above restaurant, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.
3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is without merit.