2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a person who served as the representative of the company operating the Internet News Agency H and I.

Defendant B, Inc., “B”, and Defendant D, Inc., are companies operating the Internet news “J” (hereinafter “stock company” in the Defendants’ labeling), and Defendant C is Defendant B’s citizen reporter, Defendant E, and Defendant D’s reporter.

Defendant F is a political party belonging to a justice party, Defendant G is a broadcasting person who has a number of twitters or a number of hundred thousands.

B. On November 13, 2014, Defendant B reported news articles, as shown in attached Table 1, as the news coverage by Defendant C, to “K” on the Social side of “B” website.

(hereinafter referred to as “first engineer”). (c)

Defendant D’s news report on the same day reported the same article as shown in attached Form 2, which cited the first article reported by Defendant B as “L” on the website of Defendant E as “L”.

(hereinafter referred to as “second engineer”). D.

피고 F, G의 트위터 게재 피고 F, G는 그 무렵 자신들의 트위터에 제1 기사를 리트윗하면서, 피고 F는 “일을 시켰으면 임금은 줘야죠!”라는 글을, 피고 G는 “에혀..며칠 뒤 누나랑 고법서 만날끼구 형사 고소건으루두 출두히야 할낀데 바빠서 우짜누..”라는 글을 각 게재하였다.

E. After the articles 1 and 2, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition with the Seoul Southern District Office on November 14, 11, 11, and filed a civil petition against the Plaintiff. As a result, the fact that the Plaintiff violated Article 17 of the Labor Standards Act (which stated working conditions is not delivered to the employee) was confirmed, and sent to the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor's Office "the prosecution opinion" to the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor's Office. However, the contents of the petition did not include the violation of the wage payment under Articles 36 and 43 of the Labor Standards Act, and Article 36 of the Labor Standards Act was investigated at the same time.