At around 13:50 on November 12, 2019, the Defendant used the victim E (24) who controlled the field entrance entrance at the entrance of the redevelopment area located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, and used the victim E (24) to contact the office with the office and enter the construction site in order to make it impossible to enter the site immediately.

2. The offense of assault under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act in the judgment shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim as an offense of an anti-roption penalty.

According to the records, on January 7, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, the "Agreement" was submitted to this court on January 7, 2020 to the effect that "the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant because it was agreed upon by himself."

This constitutes a case where there is an expression of intent not to punish a person under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition as to the facts charged in this case.