except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 13:00 on July 8, 2013, the Defendant entered “E” in the office of “D” located in the East Sea (hereinafter referred to as “D”), stating that “E” in each joint and several surety surety loan contract in the name of E, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, signed on the name of E, signed on the name of E, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, the future CCASH loan guarantee contract, ACASH loan guarantee contract, and the Lone Star loan contract, which intends to obtain a loan from a credit business chain company in future C, a safety loan loan loan contract, a loan guarantee contract, a loan loan contract, a loan loan contract for Lone Star loan contract, a safety loan loan contract for a safety loan, a loan loan contract for a safety loan, a contract for a loan loan for a loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the company, and exercised it as E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. A joint and several guarantee contract;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Articles 231 and 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and the choice of punishment (the occupation of exercising the falsified investigation document and the choice of imprisonment); Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not more than seven years and not more than six months;

2. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for sentencing [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] the range of the sentencing guidelines for private documents and crimes, the forgery, alteration, etc. of private documents [the scope of the sentencing guidelines for recommendations and the scope of the sentencing of recommendations]: Six months; and two years;

3. The fact that the Defendant’s decision to punish the instant crime reflects the depth of the instant crime, and that there is no criminal record except that the Defendant was ordered to suspend indictment for violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.