2. It is recognized that the Defendant was fully aware of the commission of the crime and reflects the Defendant’s mistake in depth, and that the extent of damage is relatively small, and that the Defendant agreed with the victim C, E and the victim C.

However, the crime of this case is about the use of goods fraud using the Internet, a credit card theft and a stolen credit card, and the nature of the crime is not weak; the defendant has been sentenced three times to a fine for the same kind of crime; the defendant has the record of a crime sentenced one time to a sentence; the crime of this case is committed without being aware of the fact that the crime of this case constitutes a repeated crime; and other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, career, family relationship, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.