However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 22, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from Seoul Southern District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on February 10, 2012, the Seoul Central District Court received a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime.

On April 18, 2014, at around 22:10, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.096% of blood alcohol concentration, and operated a car by 3 kilometers B from the street in front of the Yeongdeungpo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul to the front street in front of the Yeongdeungpo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of criminal records and investigation reports (former and attachment of summary order) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., the confession and reflect, the fact that it does not reach a traffic accident, and the fact that there is no other criminal records other than the previous conviction in the judgment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;