2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. The Plaintiff is a person who has conducted preliminary certification, etc. on the energy efficiency rating of buildings under the trade name of C, and the Defendant is a professor of the construction design department of D University, who was an incorporated association E (hereinafter “E”) by the end of April 2018.

B. On March 13, 2017, the Plaintiff sent to E a written estimate of service costs in which the scope of service is KRW 27 million with respect to “the instant service”, including preliminary certification of green architecture, preliminary certification of building energy efficiency rating, BF preliminary certification, preparation of energy saving plans (construction field), and service costs are KRW 27 million.

C. On January 5, 2018, the Plaintiff submitted service results to E.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the Plaintiff additional service cost of KRW 500,000 and delay damages, as the Plaintiff agreed to pay the Plaintiff the additional service cost individually on December 12, 2017.

However, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the above assertion only with the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 2, 4, 5, and 6, and there is no other evidence to prove it, the above assertion is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.