If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Around 18:30 on February 27, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “D” entertainment tavern operated by the victim C located in the Hanam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul-do, “D shall pay money, but if it is lent 1.5 million won, it shall be deemed as female employees and shall be repaid within one month.”

However, there was no intention to work as an employee of the entertainment drinking house.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 1.5 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (E) account under the name of the Defendant in advance, and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;