However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant participated in the employment-based success program from the person in charge of the employment-based branch office of the Gwangju Regional Labor Office in the employment-based Ministry of Labor, and received 160,000 won at the time of the completion of the first step counseling, and registered the vehicle engine maintenance process at the Korean vocational technical school by receiving the instruction that the Defendant would receive the job training necessary for employment, 80,000 won a total of 40,000 won subsidies for the occasional training allowances and education expenses.

However, the Defendant, upon attending a single meeting, paid the above KRW 1.60,000,00 among the above KRW 400,000, she raised a complaint and tried to assault a person in charge of the above center.

On April 30, 2018, the Defendant, at around 16:58, 16:58, at the “C Center,” the victim E, who was in charge of non-payment of expenses entrusted to the private entrusted institution, suffered injury, such as “brain chin with no one in the open two parts,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E on his/her hand when the victim E, who was in charge of non-payment of expenses entrusted to the private entrusted institution, she suffered injury to the victim E, such as “the brain satch with no one in the middle two parts,” and continuously engaged in the business related to the selection and consultation of the successful recipient of employment, when the victim F, who continued to engage in the business related to the selection of the successful recipient and counseling, she suffered injury to the victim F by providing approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim F for approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties related to employment and welfare of the victims who are public officials and injured the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A diagnosis report on injury to the F or an investigation report (attached to the Ethical diagnosis report);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (to attachCCTV ethyl photographs);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: