Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine.

Defendants are those who work as production workers in victim E companies, and Defendant A is the representative of the trade union, and Defendant B is the head of the trade union organization office.

On February 23, 2015, at around 09:30, the Defendants asserted that at the fifth fifth floor of the victim company located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju metropolitan factory, the net G was working for the manufacturing2 team of the eerotic Y, demanded the withdrawal of the contract of the company on February 16, 2015, and participated in the conference of the representatives for the resolution of industrial action.

1. At around 11:00 on February 23, 2015, Defendant A visited to demand the provision of CCTV screen images at the time of a subdivision of the said G at the time of the said G, along with the members present at the second floor of the production technology headquarters located in Gwangju Factory, Gwangju-dong, the victim company. However, the head of the production headquarters visited the victim company’s market price displayed on the relevant corridor on the ground that not only the head of the production headquarters but also the head of the production headquarters did not control CCTV screen images, thereby damaging the victim company’s market price of at least 2,00,000 won.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at a place under Paragraph (1), destroyed the market price of 200,000 won owned by the victim company, which was displayed there on the said ground, by throwing two fire parts on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each statement of the suspect interrogation protocol as to the Defendants and B

1. Each statement made by the police officer in relation to H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs of damaged goods and CCTV images;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 366 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants who have selected the punishment: Determination of a fine for each subparagraph (see, e.g., the fact that the Defendants committed the instant crime by contingency in the course of resisting against the victim company's response to workplace rent that the Defendants killed);

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse are ordered on the grounds of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act.