beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2011.11.02 2011고단127

국가기술자격법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of (E) established for the purpose of collective management of collective housing and aggregate building business in Do, and the actual operator of (State)F established for the purpose of security business, etc., who is a person in charge of overall management of the above company's funds, fund execution, etc.

The defendant, taking advantage of such position, ordered the payment of the share capital with the capital of the State (State) E, and proposed the payment of the share capital to the State (State) E account by immediately withdrawing it, and ordered the payment of the share capital to be made to those who do not actually work for the above company, and then received the payment, and (State) acquired the right of personnel of the head of the apartment management office entrusted and managed by E, with the intention to raise the money.

"2011 Highest 127"

1. Although a national technical qualification certificate is not leased, the Defendant, at the office of the above company around January 2005, paid 1.2 million won per annum to the gas technician G, a national technical qualification certificate, and borrowed the pertinent certificate from the G until February 23, 2011.

The Defendant borrowed a national technical qualification certificate from three persons, including G, from that time until February 23, 2011, as follows.

Accordingly, the Defendant borrowed national technical qualification certificates respectively.

The term “the term “the term “the term “the term “the term “the term” means “the term “the term “the term” means “the term “the term “the term” means “the term “the term “the term” means “the term “the term “the term” under which the term “the term” means “the term “the term “the term” under which the term “the term” means “the term “the term” under which the term “the term “the term” means the term, “the term, “the term,” and “the term,” under the term, “the term, “the term,” and “the term, “the term,” under the term, “the term, “the term,” under the term, “the term, “the term, “the term,” and “the term, “the term, “the term,”

2. On March 5, 2007, the Defendant violated the Commercial Act in collusion with JJ’s representative director who is the wife of the Defendant.