손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Plaintiff, from one to one year before 100 meters high from both sides of a bridge, suffered from symptoms that may continue to walk, fright to walk, and fright to walk again, due to a frighting frighting frighting. On April 5, 2011, the Plaintiff, as the representative of Defendant C, was diagnosed by the E Hospital operated in Busan Sylle (L3-4, 4-5) (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and was diagnosed by the Defendant B, a doctor affiliated with the Defendant hospital, on both sides of the instant month, received the diagnosis by the Defendant B, who was a doctor affiliated with the Defendant Hospital, for the frighting frighting frighting frighting (L3-4) and by both sides frighting bucking (L3-4, 4-5) (hereinafter “the instant operation”). At present, the Plaintiff still complained of the right buckbucking frighting frighting frighting fright.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 4, 5, 7, Eul 1-1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff's assertion was not completely removed at the time of the operation in this case, i.e., the plaintiff suffered from the pain of the part of the right buckbucks, which was caused by incomplete pressure up to now. The defendant Eul is a tortfeasor who committed an error in the operation in the operation in the above, and the defendant C is jointly and severally liable to pay the plaintiff the damages amounting to KRW 82.3 million (= KRW 5.5 million for hospital expenses such as operation expenses) to the plaintiff (= KRW 46.8 million for hospital expenses such as operation expenses).
B. Therefore, as alleged by the Plaintiff, it is not sufficient to recognize Defendant B’s error in the operation only on the basis of each of the records in 1 through 3, 6, 8, and 10, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise. Rather, according to the result of this court’s entrustment of medical records and fact-finding, the medical records appraisal of this court cannot be accurately informed of the reasons why the Plaintiff remains buckbucks and parts of the right side of the Plaintiff. However, in the instant operation, the number of bucks, which were under severe pressure after the operation, were conducted after the operation of this case.