When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 30, 2015, the Defendant called “Around November 30, 2015, the Defendant made a phone call to the Victim B, stating that “The amount of KRW 15 million is insufficient to lease an office in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Highdong. If the money is lent, it shall be repaid at the latest within a week.”

However, in fact, the defendant was unable to operate his business normally at the time, and there was no fixed income due to the absence of a certain occupation, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the money within a week.

On November 30, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 5 million won from the victim with a new bank account (D) in the name of C on November 30, 2015, and acquired 15 million won in total from the NAF account in the name of E (F).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement B and G in the police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police statement made to B and H;

1. A complaint;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment of Details of remittances);

1. Investigation report (to make international telephone communications for witnesses);

1. An investigation report (Attachment of a written confirmation of G Fact for reference);

1. Investigation report (to G telephone conversations for reference);

1. Investigation report ( telephone conversations between persons for reference and J);

1. Application of A credit inquiry information-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;