When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On August 12, 2014, from around 05:30 to 06:00 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s PC business by force by demanding the use of toilets from the DPC room operated by the victim C in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and the third floor from around August 12, 2014, on the ground that outside customers refuse to use the toilets, such as “I will not be so sold, too much, and since the Republic of Korea, you will not enter the PC,” thereby obstructing the victim’s PC business by force.

2. Around 06:05 on the same day, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “The victim F, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Guro Police Station E-gu Seoul Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant interfered with the same business at the same place, was the victim F, who was a police officer belonging to the said Seoul Police Station E-gu, Seoul Police Station, and prevented himself/herself, that the victim and the customer were able to control him/her, and the police did not receive monthly pay.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;