When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the owner of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B shopping district, and the above building is a building reported as a sales facility under the Building Act.

A person who intends to change the use of a building must obtain permission from or report it to the competent Gu office. However, around April 18, 2013, the defendant entered into a lease agreement to use D and the above building as amusement facilities through C, which is the chairperson of the above shopping district, and changed the use of the above building as a sales facility from May 17, 2013 without reporting it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. A copy of each prosecutor's statement concerning C and E;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Investigation report (B telephone call of the president of the family association);

1. Investigation report (B telephone communications with the Director of the Management Office Ear);

1. Investigation report (verification of telephone conversations between C and E after suspect investigation);

1. A written accusation and a public official statement;

1. List of project owners in violation;

1. Lease contract;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to violating photographs;

1. Article 108 (1) of the Building Act and Articles 108 (2) and 19 (2) of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.