However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 7. 14. 경 부천시 원미구 B, 1817동 206호 피해자 C의 집에서 총 공사대금 1,100만원( 계약금 200만원), 공사기간 2015. 8. 18. 경부터 2015. 8. 31. 경으로 정하여 피해자와 실내인 테리어 공사계약을 체결하면서 계약금을 교부 받고, 2015. 8. 18. 경 같은 장소에서 피해자에게 “ 인 테리 어 공사 관련하여 샷 시, 방 문틀, 화장실 등에 대한 공사 재료비용을 먼저 지불해 줘야 공사가 가능하다, 그러니 그 비용으로 600만원을 먼저 중도금 형식으로 달라. ”라고 말하였다.

However, even if the Defendant received the construction cost from the injured party, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to complete the said interior work.

Nevertheless, on July 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) transferred two million won to a new bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant as the down payment from the victim; and (c) received transfer of six million won in total to the said account as the intermediate payment around August 18, 2015, on two occasions, under the pretext of intermediate payment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Chapter 14 to inquire into the contracts for interior works, IBK Bank confirmations, letters, and liquidity transactions;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 1, 2007);