교통사고처리특례법위반등
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined. Whether or not to postpone the trial date or to resume closed pleadings are matters belonging to the court's discretion.
Therefore, even though the court below did not accept a request for postponement of the sentence date after the closing of argument to agree with the victim on the date of sentencing, the court below rejected the request and rendered a ruling.
there is no violation of law in that case.
(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Do6503 Decided October 28, 2005, etc.). Examining the record in light of the records, the lower court’s litigation procedure did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.