beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.22 2017고단2378

의료법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person other than a medical person who violates the Medical Service Act shall perform medical practice;

피고인은 의료인이 아님에도 불구하고, 2017. 2. 20. 09:20 경부터 12:15 경까지 서울 관악구 B 건물 지하 1 층에 있는 ‘C 사우나 찜질 방 ’에서 D의 귓 볼, 손가락, 발가락 끝에 약 2cm 길이의 침을 이용하여 수회에 걸쳐 침을 놓아 피를 뽑고, 복부를 주무르는 등 무면허 의료행위를 하였다.

2. The Defendant injured by occupational or practical injury is obliged not to perform any act of taking custody, etc. of taking custody of the body and clothes to the victim D at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) in a case where the patient has extended the body and clothes of the body without permission, and where there is an expansion of the body and clothes of the body, it may lead to an excess of the body and clothes of the body and the body and clothes of the body. In such a case, there is a duty of care to avoid taking custody of the body and the body and the body

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above duty of care and neglected the victim's clothes, and divided the body weight into several parts, so long as it is difficult to cover the body weight, and caused the victim to undergo an operation of the uniforms of the uniforms and removal of the serums, due to the closure of the ducing beer color, and caused the victim to undergo an operation of the uniforms of the uniforms and the removal of the serums, such as the change of the left side color, physical exercise, and the fall of the spathic, so that the victim was unable to know the treatment period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Statement made by the witness D in the third public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The CCTV video (the defendant only rhythm and rhythm, but did not take the hymar part);

It argues that the crime of occupational injury and injury cannot be recognized.

However, in view of consistent statements of witnesses D and CCTV images, it is recognized that the defendant has enjoyed the parts of the victim up to a number of times, and there is a be a be a bed of the back from the victim at the time.

참조조문