물품대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 147,932,150 for the Plaintiff and the following: 6% per annum from February 11, 2018 to May 15, 2019.
1. There is no dispute between the parties to the judgment as to the cause of the claim, or according to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 as a whole and the arguments, it is recognized that the original defendant entered into a contract for goods supply with the purport that "the plaintiff supplied the plaintiff with the land system to the defendant, and the defendant pays the price within seven days from the supply date" on May 2015, < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23578, Feb. 3, 2018; Presidential Decree No. 23578, Feb. 3, 2018; Presidential Decree No. 2420, Feb. 3, 2018; Presidential Decree No. 24870, Feb
Therefore, as the Plaintiff seeks, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 147,932,150 except for the remainder of KRW 15,00,000,000, 162,932,150, out of the total sum of the above total sum of KRW 162,932,150, and the damages for delay calculated at each rate of 6% per annum as stipulated in the Commercial Act from February 11, 2018 until May 15, 2019, when the Plaintiff supplied the last 7 days from February 3, 2018 and the application for modification of the purport of the instant claim and the cause of the claim was served on the Defendant.
2. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.